I have avoided reading any reviews, private or professional, about Revenge of the Sith. It hasn't been easy to keep my eyes from catching the, uhh, less than stellar three word reviews.
In approximately one hour, I will begin my wait with E and two of her friends in order to secure the best possible seats for the 7:00 show. At least I can indulge in watching my daughter have a good time with friends, eat Milk Duds and theater popcorn, drink a Coke, and have Jr. Mints. Those will be more than consolation for the disappointing show.
Posted by Rae at May 20, 2005 10:57 PMAh, you'll have a blast! And friends tell me--though I have not seen it--that it isn't all that bad.
Posted by: Dark Side at May 20, 2005 11:29 PMI saw it last night. My review is basically, "it was okay" :)
Posted by: Ith at May 21, 2005 09:26 PMRae, are you sure it's going to be disappointing? I'm not a big Star Wars fan--in fact, the only one I saw in its entirety was the very first one in 1977!--but I've read terrific reviews of "Sith." USA Today gave it 3 and a half stars and said non-Star Wars fans would enjoy it, while Star Wars fans would be over the moon and into the next galaxy. Most critics I've read have said it's the best in the series. You might like it!
Posted by: Cindy Swanson at May 23, 2005 02:11 PMI just don't believe the actor playing Anakin/Darth is talented enough to play that role. Haven't seen it. Hubster wants to see it this Saturday. Not really looking forward to it. And he can pay since he wants to see it so dang much.
Posted by: GrumpyBunny at May 23, 2005 03:36 PMThe first was the best. Something new and even if corny it was fun. How many body parts can we chop off with light sabres?
Posted by: R at May 23, 2005 06:42 PM
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
HammerHead
